Fuzzy Rainbows

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Hike







Hike with some peeps in the ECE department.

Monday, August 13, 2007

gchat annoyance

If you happen to use gchat at all, then you should right now log in to gmail, click settings->chat->Only allow people that I've explicitly approved to chat with me and see when I'm online.

I found out about this problem the other day after I had been emailing someone about renting a room at my house. Suddenly the next day, they showed up in gchat on my buddy list. When I looked I found that I had a shit ton of people added who were offline (many emails weren't even gmail accounts) and this kinda spooked me out. Tell your friends to turn this shit off, I can't see how it could be a useful feature.

Monday, July 16, 2007

Science reveals: Democracy dead

I just finished reading George Lakoff's book "Whose Freedom." I highly recommend checking it out, it opened my eyes to how people think (at least a theory that is much more plausible than rationalism). The basic idea is that people form thoughts based on an unconscious metaphors which define how they are able to reason about a situation. Lackoff applies this theory to politics, and speaks specifically about the neo-cons attempt to redefine the language (and hence the political metaphors which control the debate) surrounding the word "freedom."

He finishes up with a real knockout punch, a nytimes article
which describes an MRI study in which they asked conservatives and liberals to take part in. The study consists of testing what parts of the brain are activated when facts are given which contradict the persons political ideology. What they found out was that when a fact was given which contradicts your frame or metaphor, you discard of it in a largely emotional process and don't consider it whatsoever.

The conservatives have discovered this some time ago, by saying one thing and doing another, and appealing to the conservative metaphors. The democrats are beginning to catch on, and they must attempt to reframe debates and stop using language which supports the conservative metaphors. But even if they succeed, is this democracy? How can we have a democracy where it matters not what you say, but how you say it?

Saturday, July 07, 2007

Copyright fight

Imagine a world where all information is freely available. You want to learn how to cook? Google it and 3 million hits come up. After refining your search to Northern Indian cooking, you find a particularly nice book or a youTube cooking show that you like. Feeling generous you tip the content creator with a micro payment.

Imagine a world where artists and engineers are commissioned to produce work, and upon completion this work is released into the wild. A world where Copyright means you have the write to copy anything, up there with the right to bear arms and pursue happiness.

The way I see it we have two options. One option, the way we are heading, is to heightened copyright infringement law, and expanded punishment. Remember all those slippery slope arguments about this that or the other? Well this is the slope sliding down to the abyss. Take a look at Gonzalez proposed legislation. Note the proposed brand new illegal act punishable by life imprisonment. Like the war on drugs, this new copyright war will be just as inane and towing the same prison filling baggage.

The second option is that we pass new legislation, which begins to expand fair use. Eventually when the public has time to invent a new compensation model for information, we can open up to a complete right to copy. The revolution has begun, even now major Artists such as Nine Inch Nails releasing their music for free, adding even the composition files enabling people to create their own derivative works with ease. In scientific fields the free flow of data and information can only help with progress. I hypothesize that the right to copy combined with the internet will likely spawn a new golden age in literally every scientific and artistic endeavor.

Start the copyright fight now, and refuse to use the RIAA and MPAA language and metaphors which frame this debate. If we continue to use phrases such as "Intellectual Property" and even "Piracy," I'm afraid we will have already lost. Here is another article which states my views much more eloquently.

Monday, November 13, 2006

Black Bill

I decided to torture myself a little and downloaded Bill O'reilley's election day aftermath show. It is quite comical just to see how close Colbert has mimicked the guy, but nothing is as funny (or frightening) as the real thing:

"We've been saying for months that the terrorist are going to try to influence the election by stepping up the violence in Iraq, and trying to give the impression it was out of control. Now nobody can disagree with that, now that's true. But is it fair to say that the terrorists wanted the democrats to win?"


People watching this show are basically brain washed, it is amazing. I wonder if Bill consciously does this, or is it just an innate gift?

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Impeachment?

Now that the democrats put the smack down on the fucktards in Washington, what chances do we have for impeachment? I propose that if Bush gets convicted of war crimes (we would need to repeal the recent law absolving him of guilt), we could string him up on Christmas morning and have a double hangin, Bush and Saddam. If god would be so kind to maneuver that kind of sick justice, I would buy the biggest goddamn christmas tree I can find and start throwing out hallelujahs like meth at mega church!

Tuesday, July 18, 2006

More from the balcony. Too bad they are moving.

 Posted by Picasa

balcony

 Posted by Picasa

From the baclony at Cy and Jeff's place in Lugano

 Posted by Picasa

Janneke and friends in Amsterdam

 Posted by Picasa

Church of the Restaurant

 Posted by Picasa

Restaurant in Copenhagen

 Posted by Picasa

Bikes of Amsterdam

 Posted by Picasa

House boats in Amsterdam

 Posted by Picasa